Federal cryptocurrency fraud and digital asset prosecutions

Federal prosecutors are aggressively targeting cryptocurrency cases.

From NFT rug pulls and DeFi hacks to unlicensed money transmission and crypto money laundering. These cases combine securities law, computer crime statutes, and traditional fraud theories.

NFT Rug Pulls DeFi Hacks Unlicensed Money Transmission Crypto Money Laundering
18 U.S.C. § 1343

The wire fraud charging hook

Howey / CFTC

Security or commodity classification

FinCEN

State money transmitter licenses

Chainalysis · TRM Labs

Wallet-to-wallet tracing

Coinbase · Binance · Kraken

KYC records, IP logs, transaction histories

The government's file, itemized

Coverage

Crypto fraud defense covers representation in investigations and charges involving cryptocurrency — wire fraud, money laundering, securities violations, or unregistered offerings tied to digital assets.

The record

243
Pages in the reference
3
Prosecution theories
20
City indexes

The exposure

Federal crypto fraud charges can result in serious penalties including fines, imprisonment, asset forfeiture, and a permanent criminal record under 18 U.S.C. § 1343 and related statutes.

Last reviewed: 2026-07-23 · Crypto Fraud Defense editorial

Practice Areas

Federal cryptocurrency fraud and digital asset prosecutions

These cases combine securities law, computer crime statutes, and traditional fraud theories.

Wallet Trail

Federal prosecutors use blockchain analytics firms like Chainalysis and TRM Labs to trace cryptocurrency from wallet to wallet, through mixers and tumblers, to exchange cash-out points. Understanding the government's tracing methodology is critical to mounting an effective defense against crypto fraud allegations.

Exchange Records

Subpoenas to Coinbase, Binance, Kraken, and other exchanges produce KYC records, IP logs, and transaction histories that form the backbone of federal crypto prosecutions. Early intervention with experienced counsel can shape what records are obtained and how they are interpreted in your case.

Crypto Defense Strategy

Defending against federal cryptocurrency and blockchain investigations

Crypto cases present unique challenges: blockchain forensics, wallet tracing, exchange records across multiple jurisdictions, and rapidly evolving regulatory guidance.

01

Blockchain Forensics Defense

Blockchain transactions are pseudonymous, not anonymous. However, chain analysis tools used by the government can produce false positives. An independent blockchain forensic expert can challenge the government's tracing methodology and wallet attribution.

02

Regulatory Uncertainty Defense

The classification of digital assets under federal law continues to evolve. Where regulatory guidance was unclear or contradictory at the time of the alleged conduct, due process and fair notice defenses may apply.

03

International Exchange Records

Records held by exchanges in foreign jurisdictions may be subject to MLAT requests, blocking statutes, or data protection laws. Challenging the admissibility and authenticity of foreign-sourced evidence can narrow the government's case.

Reference information, not legal advice.

Common Questions

Crypto Fraud Defense FAQ

Answers to common questions about crypto fraud defense and federal charges.

What is crypto fraud defense?

Crypto fraud defense covers representation in investigations and charges involving cryptocurrency — wire fraud, money laundering, securities violations, or unregistered offerings tied to digital assets.

Read the full answer →

What is asset forfeiture?

Asset forfeiture lets the government seize property connected to criminal activity. Civil forfeiture proceeds against the property itself; criminal forfeiture follows a conviction. A defense attorney can challenge the seizure and seek return of the property.

Read the full answer →

Can federal charges be reduced or dismissed?

Yes. Federal charges can be reduced through plea negotiations with the U.S. Attorney's Office, dismissed through pretrial motions (such as a motion to suppress evidence or dismiss the indictment), or resolved through cooperation agreements that result in a lesser charge or reduced sentence.

Read the full answer →

Mere business failure, poor execution, or market downturns do not constitute fraud.

The government must prove a scheme to defraud and use of interstate wires.